# McCrady Case

> Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 4, 1960 · 399 Pa. 586

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9753939

## Case

- **Full name:** McCrady Case
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** May 4, 1960
- **Citations:** 399 Pa. 586; 160 A.2d 715; 1960 Pa. LEXIS 493
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Cohen
- **Judges:** Jones, Musmanno, Cohen, Bok, Eagen
- **Cited by:** 21 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9753939

## Opinion text

*599 Dissenting Opinion by
Mr. Justice Cohen :
I cannot conclude that tbe small taking here affected tbe ingress to or egress from plaintiff’s land. On tbe contrary, tbe testimony clearly shows that tbe taking was in no way related to tbe installation of the curbing. Since there was no taking, tbe rule established in F-K Market House Co., Inc. v. Reading, 310 Pa. 493 , 165 Atl. 398 (1933) applies. I would reverse and grant a new trial: Johnson’s Petition, 344 Pa. 5 , 23 A. 2d 880 (1942).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9753939. Public record. Not legal advice.