# Egan v. Mele

> Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · November 8, 1993 · 535 Pa. 201

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9752003

## Case

- **Full name:** Thomas C. EGAN, III, v. Mario MELE, Joseph M. Hoeffel, III and Jon D. Fox in Their Individual Capacities as Montgomery County Commissioners, and Collectively as the Montgomery County Commissioners. Appeal of Ian BERG, by and Through His Parent and Natural Guardian, Philip J. BERG, Appellant. Ian BERG, by and Through His Parent and Natural Guardian, Philip J. BERG, Appellant, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, Appellee
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** November 8, 1993
- **Citations:** 535 Pa. 201; 634 A.2d 1074; 1993 Pa. LEXIS 249
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Zappala
- **Judges:** Nix, Flaherty, Zappal, Papadakos, Cappy, Larsen, Montemuro, Zappala
- **Cited by:** 9 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9752003

## Opinion text

ZAPPALA, Justice,
concurring.
I join the Opinion of the Court. I note again, however, that we are not called upon to, nor do we, address the substantive issue of whether the Appellant is qualified to hold the Office of District Justice, much less the more fundamental question *210 whether this Court could establish such qualifications under our “general supervisory and administrative authority over all the courts and justices of the peace,” Pa. Const., Art. V, § 10(a).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9752003. Public record. Not legal advice.