# Halliday v. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc.

> Court of Appeals of Maryland · March 6, 2002 · 368 Md. 186

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9751780

## Case

- **Full name:** Melissa M. HALLIDAY v. STURM, RUGER & COMPANY, INC.
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Maryland
- **Decided:** March 6, 2002
- **Citations:** 368 Md. 186; 792 A.2d 1145; 2002 Md. LEXIS 93
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Judge
- **Judges:** Wilner
- **Cited by:** 33 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9751780

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- concluding that an attorney trust account entitled “Maryland Legal Services, Jack A. Bernstein, Esquire, IOLTA” violated “the Maryland Rules regarding Attorney Trust Accounts”

## Opinion text

BATTAGLIA Judge,
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent for the reasons so well expressed by Court of Special Appeals Judges Sonner and Hollander in their dissent in Halliday v. Sturm, Ruger & Co., 138 Md.App. 136 , 770 A.2d 1072 (2001).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9751780. Public record. Not legal advice.