# Farley v. United States

> District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 22, 1997 · 694 A.2d 887

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9750904

## Case

- **Full name:** Edward T. FARLEY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee
- **Court:** District of Columbia Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** May 22, 1997
- **Citations:** 694 A.2d 887; 1997 D.C. App. LEXIS 113; 1997 WL 290158
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by King
- **Judges:** Terry, King, Ruiz
- **Cited by:** 16 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9750904

## Opinion text

KING, Associate Judge,
concurring in the result:
Because the possible relevance of the complaint filed by Miles with the Civilian Complaint Review Board was first raised by appellate counsel 1 in the brief on appeal, there is nothing in the record relating to the question of whether that complaint might be producible under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). Therefore, I do not object either to a remand to permit an appropriate record to be made *891 on that point or to a direction to the trial court to appoint new counsel.
. The same counsel also represented appellant in the D.C.Code § 23-110 hearing.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9750904. Public record. Not legal advice.
