# Kim Long Ko v. United States

> District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 8, 1997 · 694 A.2d 73

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9750873

## Case

- **Full name:** Kim Long KO, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee
- **Court:** District of Columbia Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** May 8, 1997
- **Citations:** 694 A.2d 73; 1997 D.C. App. LEXIS 85; 1997 WL 229164
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Scuwelb, Reid, Mack
- **Cited by:** 4 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9750873

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the concurring opinion of Judge Sehwelb, except that a majority of the court does not adopt the discussion in Parts III-B. and III-C. (4) of Judge Schwelb’s opinion regarding the question whether the trial judge failed to comply with D.C.Code §§ 31-2704, -2711, and -2712 (1993). As to the interpretation of those provisions, the judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the concurring opinion of Judge Reid, with whom Judge Mack joins. Specifically, a majority of the court holds that there was error in these respects, but not plain error. Judge Sehwelb would hold only that there was no plain error.
Affirmed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9750873. Public record. Not legal advice.