# Dell v. Department of Employment Services

> District of Columbia Court of Appeals · September 30, 1985 · 499 A.2d 102

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9750554

## Case

- **Full name:** Raymond DELL, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, Respondent, International Hotel and Crum & Forster Insurance Company, Intervenors
- **Court:** District of Columbia Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** September 30, 1985
- **Citations:** 499 A.2d 102; 1985 D.C. App. LEXIS 496
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Newman
- **Judges:** Pryor, Newman, Terry
- **Cited by:** 75 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9750554

## Opinion text

NEWMAN, Associate Judge,
concurring:
I join the court’s opinion but write separately to address one case discussed therein, Dankman v. District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics, ante at 106. I joined Judge Mack’s dissent in that case, 443 A.2d at 527-33, contending that the regulation, as construed by this court, was in violation of the statute. I am still of that view. However, I agree with the opinion of the court in this case that the Director of the Department of Employment Services could not qualify a valid rule into oblivion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9750554. Public record. Not legal advice.