# Hoffman v. UNEMP. COMP. BD. OF REVIEW

> Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · April 27, 1990 · 524 Pa. 470

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9749995

## Case

- **Full name:** Kenneth E. HOFFMAN, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW, Appellee, and Joy Manufacturing Company, Intervenor, Appellee
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** April 27, 1990
- **Citations:** 524 Pa. 470; 574 A.2d 57; 1990 Pa. LEXIS 94
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Flaherty
- **Judges:** Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Zappala, Papadakos, Cappy
- **Cited by:** 9 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9749995

## Opinion text

FLAHERTY, Justice,
concurring.
I deem it unwise to express such a mechanical application of Vrotney, as such could work to offset the reasonable economic balance affected on both sides of a work stoppage. Here, since there was no finding that to provide employment on a day to day basis on August 6, 1983 was economically unreasonable, I concur in the result.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9749995. Public record. Not legal advice.