# Maryland State Administrative Board of Election Laws v. Talbot County

> Court of Appeals of Maryland · June 8, 1989 · 316 Md. 332

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9748675

## Case

- **Full name:** MARYLAND STATE ADMINISTRATIVE BOARD OF ELECTION LAWS Et Al. v. TALBOT COUNTY, Maryland Et Al.
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Maryland
- **Decided:** June 8, 1989
- **Citations:** 316 Md. 332; 558 A.2d 724
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Cole
- **Judges:** Murphy, Eldridge, Cole, Rodowsky, McAuliffe, Blackwell, Orth
- **Cited by:** 23 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9748675

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- explaining that declaratory judgment is inappropriate where issue is moot or where it will not serve a useful purpose or terminate a controversy
- observing that “[j]usticiability encompasses a number of requirements,” including that “the plaintiffs must have standing to bring suit”

## Opinion text

COLE, Judge,
dissenting:
I dissent for reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in Cheeks v. Cedlair Corp., 287 Md. 595, 632 , 415 A.2d 255 (1980).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9748675. Public record. Not legal advice.