# Helsel v. RODGERS

> Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · October 9, 1970 · 440 Pa. 516

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9747489

## Case

- **Full name:** Helsel v. Rodgers Et Al., Appellants
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** October 9, 1970
- **Citations:** 440 Pa. 516; 269 A.2d 917; 1970 Pa. LEXIS 605
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Roberts
- **Judges:** Bell, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy
- **Cited by:** 7 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9747489

## Opinion text

Concurring Opinion by
Mr. Justice Roberts:
While I concur in the majority’s conclusion that this interlocutory order is appealable under the Act of 1925, I do so because I feel that, since Pa. R.C.P. 1112 goes to the power of the various courts of common pleas to entertain actions in quo warranto, it is more a rule of “jurisdiction” than of “venue.” Not all objections to “venue” are similarly appealable. Caplan v. Keystone Weaving Mills, 431 Pa. 407 , 246 A. 2d 384 (1968).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9747489. Public record. Not legal advice.