# Teamsters Local 115 v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

> Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · December 29, 1992 · 152 Pa. Commw. 394

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9747307

## Case

- **Full name:** TEAMSTERS LOCAL 115, Petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent (Two Cases)
- **Court:** Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** December 29, 1992
- **Citations:** 152 Pa. Commw. 394; 619 A.2d 382; 1992 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 776
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Kelley
- **Judges:** Craig, Doyle, Colins, Palladino, McGinley, Smith, Kelley
- **Cited by:** 14 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9747307

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that judicial employers may not interfere with employees’ attempts to form a union for purposes of collectively bargaining with the county on issues related to their pay and benefits

## Opinion text

KELLEY, Judge,
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent.
*409 I believe that the literal construction of the respective sections of the Judicial Code gives exclusive jurisdiction in this matter to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County.
All the employees are county employees and 42 Pa.C.S. § 933(a)(l)(vii) clearly indicates common pleas jurisdiction. The majority concludes likewise but goes a step further. I believe that the majority misconstrues the language and intent by bringing in the jurisdiction of this court under 42 Pa.C.S. § 102.
Accordingly, I would quash the appeal.
COLINS, J., joins in this dissent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9747307. Public record. Not legal advice.