# Long v. United States

> District of Columbia Court of Appeals · October 28, 1996 · 687 A.2d 1331

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9746510

## Case

- **Full name:** Damian D. LONG, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee
- **Court:** District of Columbia Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** October 28, 1996
- **Citations:** 687 A.2d 1331; 1996 D.C. App. LEXIS 234; 1996 WL 626249
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Kern
- **Judges:** Ferren, Terry, Kern
- **Cited by:** 14 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9746510

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that “intent to rob can be established when the government has presented facts that suffice as circumstantial evidence to warrant an inference of the intent of the robbery”
- describing Scutchings in parenthetical as a case where "indictment charged obstruction of justice as to one witness; proof at trial concerned a different witness.”

## Opinion text

KERN, Senior Judge,
concurring:
I concur in the result the majority reaches in its opinion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9746510. Public record. Not legal advice.