# Commonwealth v. Johnstown Redevelopment Authority

> Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · March 25, 1991 · 527 Pa. 71

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9731595

## Case

- **Full name:** COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, PENNSYLVANIA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION, Appellant, v. JOHNSTOWN REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, Appellee
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** March 25, 1991
- **Citations:** 527 Pa. 71; 588 A.2d 497; 62 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,400; 1991 Pa. LEXIS 73
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Larsen
- **Judges:** Cappy, Flaherty, Larsen, McDERMOTT, Nix, Papadakos, Zappala
- **Cited by:** 5 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9731595

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- noting “that applicability of the phrase ‘best able and most competent’ has caused considerable consternation”

## Opinion text

*82 LARSEN, Justice,
dissenting.
I dissent, and in support thereof, adopt and cite the dissenting opinion of President Judge David Craig, Johnstown Redevelopment Authority v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission, 124 Pa.Cmwlth. 344 , 556 A.2d 479 (1989).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9731595. Public record. Not legal advice.