# Archer v. District of Columbia Dept. of Human Resources

> District of Columbia Court of Appeals · July 6, 1977 · 375 A.2d 523

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9729755

## Case

- **Full name:** Louise ARCHER Et Al., Petitioners, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPT. OF HUMAN RESOURCES, Respondent
- **Court:** District of Columbia Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** July 6, 1977
- **Citations:** 375 A.2d 523; 1977 D.C. App. LEXIS 349
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Mack
- **Judges:** Kern, Gallagher, Mack
- **Cited by:** 4 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9729755

## Opinion text

MACK, Associate Judge,
concurring in part:
I join in the court’s opinion to the extent that it affirms the Department of Human Resources’ decision (i. e., that the Fair Hearings Division was the wrong forum for petitioners’ claims since it lacked authority to rule on the validity of the City Council Regulation and that the request for an evi-dentiary hearing was therefore properly dismissed). However, I do not agree that petitioners’ claim for restitution is before this court, and I would not reach the issue.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9729755. Public record. Not legal advice.