# Borgess Medical Center v. Resto

> Michigan Court of Appeals · March 30, 2007 · 273 Mich. App. 558

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9728891

## Case

- **Full name:** Borgess Medical Center v. Resto
- **Court:** Michigan Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** March 30, 2007
- **Citations:** 273 Mich. App. 558; 730 N.W.2d 738
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by White
- **Judges:** O'Connell, White, Markey
- **Cited by:** 6 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9728891

## Opinion text

WHITE, J.
(concurring). I write separately simply to state that I do not rely on a statutory distinction between “a person suffering accidental bodily injury” and a claimant under MCL 500.3114(4). Defendant indisputably insured the owner of the occupied vehicle, and no insurer in a higher priority was identified.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9728891. Public record. Not legal advice.