# Curtis v. San Mateo Junior College District

> California Court of Appeal · October 17, 1972 · 28 Cal. App. 3d 161

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9725295

## Case

- **Full name:** ROBERT MARION CURTIS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SAN MATEO JUNIOR COLLEGE DISTRICT OF SAN MATEO COUNTY, Defendant and Respondent
- **Court:** California Court of Appeal
- **Decided:** October 17, 1972
- **Citations:** 28 Cal. App. 3d 161; 103 Cal. Rptr. 33; 1972 Cal. App. LEXIS 746
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Draper
- **Judges:** Brown, Draper
- **Cited by:** 5 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9725295

## Opinion text

DRAPER, P. J., Concurring.
This issue is by no means free from doubt. Sections 13309 and 13311, particularly the latter, do distinguish between teaching in day classes and evening classes. Arguably, it is therefore inconsistent to hold that tenure in one of these classifications is obtained by service which reaches the three-year minimum only by combining the two *166 distinct types of teaching. Review of the problems which led to enactment of section 13311, however, seems to negate such a legislative intent. If this is a misreading of the legislative purpose, an amending enactment can readily put the matter straight. I therefore concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9725295. Public record. Not legal advice.