# Citizens Ass'n of Georgetown v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

> District of Columbia Court of Appeals · March 22, 1972 · 288 A.2d 666

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9719209

## Case

- **Full name:** CITIZENS ASSOCIATION OF GEORGETOWN, INC., Petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD, Respondent
- **Court:** District of Columbia Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** March 22, 1972
- **Citations:** 288 A.2d 666; 1972 D.C. App. LEXIS 358
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Pair
- **Judges:** Hood, Gallagher
- **Cited by:** 16 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9719209

## Opinion text

PAIR, Associate Judge
(concurring).
I concur in the conclusion reached by Judge Gallagher in the majority opinion but solely for the reason that the Board, in deciding that a license should issue, may have officially noticed and relied upon reports not made a part of the administrative record.
I am, however, forced to disassociate myself from any participation in Judge Gallagher’s holding that this court may overturn the Board’s finding of moral fitness, even though there is no challenge to such finding and no contrary evidence respecting moral fitness appears of record. See Braniff Airways, Inc. v. C. A. B., 126 U.S.App.D.C. 399, 409 , 379 F.2d 453, 463 (1967).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9719209. Public record. Not legal advice.