# State v. Sauls

> Supreme Court of Iowa · October 17, 1984 · 356 N.W.2d 516

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9717607

## Case

- **Full name:** STATE of Iowa, Appellee, v. Mark R. SAULS, Appellant
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Iowa
- **Decided:** October 17, 1984
- **Citations:** 356 N.W.2d 516; 1984 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1266
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Harris
- **Judges:** Uhlenhopp, Harris, Carter, McGiverin, Schultz
- **Cited by:** 20 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9717607

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- stating federal cases interpreting federal rules similar to state rules, while not binding on this court, constitute persuasive authority

## Opinion text

HARRIS, Justice
(concurring).
I agree with the majority opinion except for its discussion of our holding in State v. Snodgrass, 346 N.W.2d 472 (Iowa 1984). Because I adhere to my dissent in Snod-grass, I concur in result.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9717607. Public record. Not legal advice.