# Bunting v. State

> Court of Appeals of Maryland · May 5, 1988 · 312 Md. 472

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9714392

## Case

- **Full name:** Gerald T. BUNTING v. STATE of Maryland
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Maryland
- **Decided:** May 5, 1988
- **Citations:** 312 Md. 472; 540 A.2d 805; 1988 Md. LEXIS 69
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Eldridge
- **Judges:** Eldridge
- **Cited by:** 51 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9714392

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- declining to consider whether the challenged order satisfied the first three requirements of the collateral order doctrine because the order failed the fourth requirement

## Opinion text

ELDRIDGE, Judge,
concurring:
I concur with the result and with all of the Court’s opinion except footnote 9. In my view, the approach toward the collateral order doctrine taken in the present case cannot be reconciled with the approach taken by the Court in State v. Hogg, 311 Md. 446 , 535 A.2d 923 (1988). Hogg should be overruled.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9714392. Public record. Not legal advice.