# Commonwealth v. Coleman

> Superior Court of Pennsylvania · June 28, 1976 · 241 Pa. Super. 450

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9712755

## Case

- **Full name:** COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Joshua COLEMAN, Appellant
- **Court:** Superior Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** June 28, 1976
- **Citations:** 241 Pa. Super. 450; 361 A.2d 870; 1976 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1988
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Cercone
- **Judges:** Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Cercone, Price, Van Voort Spaeth, Van Voort
- **Cited by:** 24 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- **Red flag:** Reversed on other grounds by Commonwealth v. Coleman, 477 Pa. 400 (1978).
- Negative treatments: 1
- Distinguished by: 1
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9712755

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that delay was not caused by appellant’s request for a continuance, but resulted from scheduling practices then in effect

## Opinion text

CERCONE, Judge
(concurring):
I concur in the result in the instant case for the reasons expressed in my concurring opinion in Commonwealth v. Smith, - Pa.Super. -, 361 A.2d 862 (J. 1687/1975).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9712755. Public record. Not legal advice.