# W.M. Schlosser Co. v. Uninsured Employer's Fund

> Court of Appeals of Maryland · May 12, 2010 · 414 Md. 195

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9707846

## Case

- **Full name:** W.M. SCHLOSSER CO., Et Al. v. UNINSURED EMPLOYERS’ FUND, Et Al.
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Maryland
- **Decided:** May 12, 2010
- **Citations:** 414 Md. 195; 994 A.2d 956; 2010 Md. LEXIS 190
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent
- **Judges:** Battaglia
- **Cited by:** 22 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9707846

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- explaining that the Commission's conclusions are adequately supported as long as "a reasoning mind reasonably could have reached the factual conclusion" reached by the Commission
- stating that in a workers’ compensation case, “the first question to be resolved is whether [the claimant] is a ‘covered employee’ ”

## Opinion text

Dissenting Opinion by HARRELL, J., which BARBERA, J., joins
1 dissent. I would affirm the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals (which reversed the Circuit Court for Baltimore County) for the reasons stated in that court’s reported opinion in this matter, 186 Md.App. 599 , 975 A.2d 221 (2009).
Judge BARBERA authorizes me to state that she joins this dissenting opinion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9707846. Public record. Not legal advice.