# Wade v. City of North Chicago Police Pension Board

> Appellate Court of Illinois · December 3, 2004 · 353 Ill. App. 3d 852

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9706023

## Case

- **Full name:** LAWRENCE WADE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE CITY OF NORTH CHICAGO POLICE PENSION BOARD, Defendant-Appellee
- **Court:** Appellate Court of Illinois
- **Decided:** December 3, 2004
- **Citations:** 353 Ill. App. 3d 852; 289 Ill. Dec. 411; 819 N.E.2d 1211; 2004 Ill. App. LEXIS 1463
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Bowman
- **Judges:** Byrne, Bowman
- **Cited by:** 8 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- **Red flag:** Vacated by Wade v. City of North Chicago Police Pension Board, 215 Ill. 2d 620 (2005).
- Negative treatments: 1
- Distinguished by: 0
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9706023

## Opinion text

JUSTICE BOWMAN, dissenting:
I respectfully dissent. I believe that the majority decision of Coyne v. Milan Police Pension Board, 347 Ill. App. 3d 713, 727-30 (2004), as set forth in section 5, “Physicians’ Certificates of Disability,” correctly interprets section 3 — 115 of the Illinois Pension Code (40 ILCS 5/3— 115 (West 2002)). I fully and completely adopt the Coyne majority’s analysis and reasoning.
Because the majority in the case sub judice did not address the other issues raised on appeal, I restrict my dissent to the majority’s interpretation of section 3 — 115 of the Pension Code.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9706023. Public record. Not legal advice.