# Palandro v. Bollinger

> Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · November 28, 1962 · 409 Pa. 296

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9705835

## Case

- **Full name:** Palandro v. Bollinger, Appellant
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** November 28, 1962
- **Citations:** 409 Pa. 296; 186 A.2d 11; 1962 Pa. LEXIS 444
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Bell
- **Judges:** Bell, Musmanno, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O'Brien, Keim
- **Cited by:** 13 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9705835

## Opinion text

*300 Dissenting Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Bell:
I dissent — the jury specifically found plaintiff (and defendant) were guilty of negligence. If the admission of testimony that plaintiffs full salary and all of his expenses had been paid was error, it was clearly harmless error.
Mr. Justice Benjamin R. Jones joins in this dissenting opinion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9705835. Public record. Not legal advice.