# Pattinato v. Moody

> Superior Court of Pennsylvania · June 29, 1977 · 248 Pa. Super. 32

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9701756

## Case

- **Full name:** Frank PATTINATO and Angeline Pattinato, His Wife, Appellants, v. Robert MOODY and Frank Wudkwych, Individually, and T/D/B/A M & W Construction Company, Appellees
- **Court:** Superior Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** June 29, 1977
- **Citations:** 248 Pa. Super. 32; 374 A.2d 1302; 1977 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1960
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Voort
- **Judges:** Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Cercone, Price, Van Voort Spaeth, Van Voort
- **Cited by:** 7 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9701756

## Opinion text

VAN der VOORT, Judge,
concurring:
I join in the Opinion authored by Judge HOFFMAN with the understanding on my part that we are affirming the Order of the Court below with respect not only to Frank Wudkwych, but also with respect to M & W Construction Company and with the understanding on my part that the *41 case is remanded both for consideration and decision of Robert Moody’s Petition to Open the Judgment against him and for further proceedings consistent with our Opinion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9701756. Public record. Not legal advice.