# Wallach v. Board of Education

> Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · February 28, 1994 · 99 Md. App. 386

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9699760

## Case

- **Full name:** Richard WALLACH v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY
- **Court:** Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
- **Decided:** February 28, 1994
- **Citations:** 99 Md. App. 386; 637 A.2d 859; 1994 Md. App. LEXIS 38
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Wilner
- **Judges:** Wilner, Bishop, Fischer
- **Cited by:** 5 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9699760

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that a prior conviction for conspiracy to distribute marijuana is not admissible for impeachment purposes

## Opinion text

*395 WILNER, Chief Judge, concurring.
I concur in the result reached by the panel majority because I agree that the trial court erred in allowing Dr. Perrone to testify to his opinion of Wallach’s speed. I do not agree, however, that evidence of Wallach’s prior conviction for conspiracy was necessarily inadmissible. I would hold the evidence of a prior conviction for conspiracy to be eligible for admission, subject to the balancing process required by Rule l-502(a).
The gist of a criminal conspiracy is the unlawful agreement, not the object of the agreement. The agreement is one that necessarily anticipates, and indeed is devoted to, the commission of one or more illegal acts, and therefore contains an element of furtiveness and malevolent deliberation not necessarily implicit in the mere act of distributing controlled substances. The nature of the particular conspiracy can be considered in the balancing process. I do not regard this case as controlled by Giddens v. State.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9699760. Public record. Not legal advice.