# Robinson v. Board of Trustees of the Maine State Retirement System

> Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · April 7, 1987 · 523 A.2d 1376

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9696990

## Case

- **Full name:** William F. ROBINSON v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the MAINE STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM
- **Court:** Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
- **Decided:** April 7, 1987
- **Citations:** 523 A.2d 1376; 1987 Me. LEXIS 694
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Wathen
- **Judges:** McKusick, Nichols, Roberts, Wathen, Glassman, Clifford
- **Cited by:** 14 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9696990

## Opinion text

WATHEN, Justice,
with whom NICHOLS, Justice, joins dissenting
I respectfully dissent from the opinion of the Court. I am unable to find a principled basis for ignoring the plain meaning of the language set forth in section 1121(1)(C). Although the Court attempts to justify undertaking its statutory exegesis, in the final analysis the effort is unpersuasive. Nothing is gained by characterizing plaintiffs argument as urging a “mechanical” application of the literal terms of the statute. Plaintiff correctly asserts that in the absence of ambiguity there is no reason to engage in any further construction of the language. I would apply the statute as written and affirm the judgment of the Superior Court.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9696990. Public record. Not legal advice.