# Polascik v. Baldwin

> Superior Court of Pennsylvania · November 22, 1976 · 245 Pa. Super. 1

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9695682

## Case

- **Full name:** John J. POLASCIK, Appellant, v. William O. BALDWIN and Mary P. Barrett
- **Court:** Superior Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** November 22, 1976
- **Citations:** 245 Pa. Super. 1; 369 A.2d 263; 1976 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2195
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Hoffman
- **Judges:** Spaeth, Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Cercone, Price, Van Voort Spaeth
- **Cited by:** 16 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9695682

## Opinion text

HOFFMAN, Judge,
concurring:
I agree with the Majority’s conclusion that this appeal must be quashed because the appeal to this Court was not filed in a timely manner. Caples v. Klugman, 202 Pa.Super. 517 , 198 A.2d 342 (1964); Appellate Court Jurisdiction Act, Act of July 31, 1970, P.L. 673, No. 223, art. V, § 502; 17 P.S. § 211.502(d). I do not join in the additional discussion because the Court engages in de novo factfinding based solely on speculation concerning the state of the record.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9695682. Public record. Not legal advice.