# Pagano v. REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, ETC.

> Superior Court of Pennsylvania · June 29, 1977 · 249 Pa. Super. 303

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9694254

## Case

- **Full name:** Joseph PAGANO and Virginia Pagano, H/W and Arnold Pagano, Appellants, v. REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF the CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Appellee
- **Court:** Superior Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** June 29, 1977
- **Citations:** 249 Pa. Super. 303; 376 A.2d 999; 1977 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2033
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Price
- **Judges:** Spaeth, Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Cercone, Price, Van Voort Spaeth
- **Cited by:** 6 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9694254

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- discussing examples of rent substitutes

## Opinion text

PRICE, Judge,
dissenting:
I would affirm the entry of compulsory non-suit on the excellent opinion of the lower court.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9694254. Public record. Not legal advice.