# Burral v. State

> Court of Appeals of Maryland · February 12, 1999 · 352 Md. 707

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9694201

## Case

- **Full name:** Lewis William BURRAL v. STATE of Maryland
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Maryland
- **Decided:** February 12, 1999
- **Citations:** 352 Md. 707; 724 A.2d 65
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Eldridge
- **Judges:** Bell, Eldridge, Rodowsky, Chasanow, Raker, Wilner, Karwacki
- **Cited by:** 12 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9694201

## Opinion text

ELDRIDGE, Judge,
dissenting.
I would reserve and remand for a new trial for the reasons set forth in that portion of Judge Chasanow’s opinion dealing with the Supreme Court’s opinion in Rock v. Arkansas, 483 U.S. 44 , 107 S.Ct. 2704 , 97 L.Ed.2d 37 (1987).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9694201. Public record. Not legal advice.