# People v. Jambor

> Michigan Court of Appeals · March 30, 2007 · 273 Mich. App. 477

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9686023

## Case

- **Full name:** People v. Jambor (On Remand)
- **Court:** Michigan Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** March 30, 2007
- **Citations:** 273 Mich. App. 477; 729 N.W.2d 569
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Cooper
- **Judges:** Cavanagh, Cooper, Fitzgerald
- **Cited by:** 28 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9686023

## Opinion text

COOPER, EJ.
0concurring). I concur in the result only, because I am bound to do so by the current state of the law, but I would urge our Supreme Court to reconsider whether the boundaries of MRE 803(6) may or should really stretch so far as to include fingerprint cards prepared by a police officer in the course of an investigation of a crime scene. I would find that those cards properly fall within “matters observed by police officers” “in criminal cases,” and that MRE 803(8) ought to exclude them.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9686023. Public record. Not legal advice.