# Burton v. State

> Tennessee Supreme Court · March 5, 1964 · 214 Tenn. 9

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9681357

## Case

- **Full name:** Irvin D. Burton and Foster Brandon, Plaintiffs in Error, v. State of Tennessee, Defendant in Error
- **Court:** Tennessee Supreme Court
- **Decided:** March 5, 1964
- **Citations:** 214 Tenn. 9; 18 McCanless 9; 377 S.W.2d 900; 1964 Tenn. LEXIS 441
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Judges:** Holmes
- **Cited by:** 19 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9681357

## Opinion text

Opinion on Petition to Behear
Counsel for the defendant have filed a petition to rehear in which no new argument is made, no new authority adduced and no material fact is pointed out as overlooked. We have fully considered all of the contentions of the *23 defendant which, are restated in the petition to rehear and have found them without merit. Therefore, pursuant to Rule 32 of Rules of this Court, 209 Tenn. 806 , the petition to rehear is denied.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9681357. Public record. Not legal advice.