# Ross v. Robb

> Missouri Court of Appeals · May 10, 1983 · 651 S.W.2d 680

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9680470

## Case

- **Full name:** Robert ROSS, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Tracy v. ROBB, Guy S. Wright, Howard Fleming, David B. Riley, Salim S. Tadrus, and Larry D. Zimmerman, as Duly Elected Members of the Board of Education of Moberly Public School District No. 81, Defendants-Appellants
- **Court:** Missouri Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** May 10, 1983
- **Citations:** 651 S.W.2d 680; 11 Educ. L. Rep. 1100; 1983 Mo. App. LEXIS 3294
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Somerville
- **Judges:** Clark, Dixon, Kennedy, Manford, Pritchard, Shan-Gler, Somerville
- **Cited by:** 11 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9680470

## Opinion text

SOMERVILLE, Chief Judge,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part in the opinion of Dixon, J., to-wit, I *686 concur that the constitutionality of § 168.-114, RSMo 1978 was adequately raised but dissent as to that part which construes § 536.140, RSMo 1978 as limiting circuit and appellate court review of administrative decisions to matters raised in the petition for review. Such a construction is inconsistent with the clear, plain language of the statute.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9680470. Public record. Not legal advice.