# London v. Merriman

> Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · May 26, 1988 · 756 S.W.2d 736

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9679651

## Case

- **Full name:** Dorothy LONDON and McCord Exploration Company, Appellants, v. Dr. George MERRIMAN, Jr., Cornelia Matthews, Beatrice Harris, Appellees
- **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
- **Decided:** May 26, 1988
- **Citations:** 756 S.W.2d 736; 111 Oil & Gas Rep. 591; 1988 Tex. App. LEXIS 1222; 1988 WL 53031
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Judges:** Nye, Utter, Benavides
- **Cited by:** 16 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9679651

## Opinion text

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
Both Dorothy London and McCord Exploration Company have filed motions for rehearing. McCord complains that we should not have assessed costs against it since its appeal was made moot as a result of our affirmance on the point of error London raised, as we noted in our original opinion. We agree with McCord and sustain its point of error on rehearing. Costs are hereby assessed solely against the unsuccessful appellant, London.
London’s rehearing points of error reiterate her points on original submission. We have carefully reconsidered our original holding and conclude that the case was correctly decided. We overrule London’s points of error on rehearing.
Appellants’ motions for rehearing are GRANTED IN PART AND OVERRULED IN PART.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9679651. Public record. Not legal advice.