# Petition of Board of Public Buildings

> Supreme Court of Missouri · December 11, 1962 · 363 S.W.2d 598

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9676791

## Case

- **Full name:** Petition of the BOARD OF PUBLIC BUILDINGS of the State of Missouri, and John M. Dalton, Governor, Hilary A. Bush, Lieutenant Governor, and Thomas F. Eagleton, Attorney General, Constituting the Members of Said Board. the BOARD OF PUBLIC BUILDINGS of the State of Missouri, and John M. Dalton, Governor, Hilary A. Bush, Lieutenant Governor, and Thomas F. Eagleton, Attorney General, Constituting the Members of Said Board (Petitioners), Respondents, v. Joseph M. CROWE and Kathryn K. Crowe (Intervenors), Appellants
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Missouri
- **Decided:** December 11, 1962
- **Citations:** 363 S.W.2d 598
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Storckman
- **Judges:** Eager, Storckman
- **Cited by:** 29 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9676791

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- recognizing that the treasury held certain funds in trust for the Board of Public Buildings, and that such funds need not be appropriated according to the spending priorities mandated in art. Ill, sec. 36

## Opinion text

STORCKMAN, Judge
(dissenting).
In my opinion the proceeds of the reve-, nue bonds in question are not “revenue collected and money received by the state” within the meaning of Art. III, § 36, of the Constitution of Missouri, and therefore need not go into the state treasury and be subject to appropriation. It is my view that the Board of Public Buildings is legally entitled to hold such proceeds in trust and to use them without appropriation for the purposes which the general assembly has previously authorized and designated by §§ 8.370 to 8.450, RSMo 1959, V.A.M.S. State ex rel. Thompson v. Board of Regents for Northeast Missouri State Teachers’ College, 305 Mo. 57 , 264 S.W. 698, 699-700 [1-4]. I can see no valid distinction between the proceeds of the revenue bonds and the rental revenue of the completed office building which the Board is authorized to collect and apply to the payment of the bonds.
Therefore, I respectfully dissent from that portion of the opinion which holds to the contrary.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9676791. Public record. Not legal advice.