# Loudres v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · September 10, 1980 · 614 S.W.2d 407

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9673551

## Case

- **Full name:** Woodie LOUDRES, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** September 10, 1980
- **Citations:** 614 S.W.2d 407; 1980 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1344
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Teague
- **Judges:** Clinton, Roberts, Teague, McCormick, Dally
- **Cited by:** 15 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9673551

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- noting that motive is not an element of a crime

## Opinion text

CONCURRING OPINION TO OVERRULING STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING WITHOUT WRITTEN OPINION
TEAGUE, Judge.
I concur in the majority’s action for the reasons set forth in my Concurring Opinion to Overruling State’s Motion for Rehearing Without Written Opinion in Pierson v. State, 614 S.W.2d 102 (1981).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9673551. Public record. Not legal advice.