# Dunn v. Sears Roebuck and Co.

> Court of Appeals of Texas · September 19, 1963 · 371 S.W.2d 731

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9672562

## Case

- **Full name:** Daniel Bruce DUNN, B/N/F A. M. Dunn, Appellant, v. SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO. Et Al., Appellees
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** September 19, 1963
- **Citations:** 371 S.W.2d 731; 1963 Tex. App. LEXIS 1728
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Coleman
- **Judges:** Bell, Coleman
- **Cited by:** 16 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9672562

## Opinion text

COLEMAN, Justice
(dissenting).
I respectfully dissent. It is my opinion that the answer made by the jury to Special Issue No. 6 is against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence. I am also of the opinion that the answer of the jury to Special Issue No. 15 is not supported by any evidence. I would reverse the judgment of the Trial Court and remand the case for a new trial.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9672562. Public record. Not legal advice.