# State v. Knapp

> Wisconsin Supreme Court · July 14, 2005 · 285 Wis. 2d 86

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9671823

## Case

- **Full name:** State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Respondent, v. Matthew J. Knapp, Defendant-Respondent-Cross-Appellant
- **Court:** Wisconsin Supreme Court
- **Decided:** July 14, 2005
- **Citations:** 285 Wis. 2d 86; 700 N.W.2d 899; 2005 WI 127; 2005 Wisc. LEXIS 395
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Prosser
- **Judges:** Crooks, Wilcox, Prosser, Abrahamson, Bradley, Butler, Roggensack
- **Cited by:** 109 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9671823

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- noting that “the goals of the exclusionary rule and fruit of the poisonous tree doctrines are to curb ‘illegal governmental activity,”’ and concluding that “it is appropriate that the exclusionary rule bars physical fruits obtained from a deliberate Miranda violation under Art…
- explaining decisions like Eason as part of a trend toward a more independent role for state constitutions in protecting individual rights
- noting that preserving judicial integrity refers to preventing the judicial process from being subverted by law enforcement officers' unconstitutional actions

## Opinion text

DAVID T. PROSSER, J.
¶ 108. {dissenting). I respectfully dissent for the reasons stated in my dissent in State v. Dubose, 2005 WI 126 , 285 Wis. 2d 143 , 699 N.W.2d 582 .

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9671823. Public record. Not legal advice.