# Jackson v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · September 19, 1990 · 822 S.W.2d 18

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9668403

## Case

- **Full name:** Jimmy JACKSON, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** September 19, 1990
- **Citations:** 822 S.W.2d 18; 1990 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 142; 1990 WL 324477
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Overstreet
- **Judges:** Overstreet, Teague, Clinton, Davis, Maloney
- **Cited by:** 49 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9668403

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- stating that an officer who witnessed a defendant giving a statement to another officer could testify to his opinion that the defendant gave the statement voluntarily because such testimony was a “mere shorthand rendering of the facts” demonstrating the defendant’s mental atti…

## Opinion text

OVERSTREET, Judge,
dissenting to denial of appellant’s motion for leave to file motion for rehearing.
Because of the particular circumstances and facts of this case, (1) the age of the appellant and (2) the error of the court allowing the prosecutor to limit the jurors’ consideration of their beliefs on rehabilitation in answering Special Issue # 2, I would grant appellant’s motion for rehearing to reexamine the error complained of in point of error #3. The majority refuses, therefore, I dissent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9668403. Public record. Not legal advice.