# Caldwell v. State

> Court of Appeals of Arkansas · February 13, 1980 · 267 Ark. 1053

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9661841

## Case

- **Full name:** Earl CALDWELL v. STATE of Arkansas
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Arkansas
- **Decided:** February 13, 1980
- **Citations:** 267 Ark. 1053; 594 S.W.2d 24
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Newbern
- **Judges:** Penix, Wright, Newbern
- **Cited by:** 22 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9661841

## Opinion text

David Newbern, Judge, concurring. Although I concur in the result reached, I cannot agree with that part of the majority opinion which characterizes the defense counsel’s cross examination of the prosecuting witness as “hounding and badgering” and “picayune.”
Chief Judge Wright joins in this concurring opinion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9661841. Public record. Not legal advice.