# Winkles v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · April 7, 1982 · 634 S.W.2d 289

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9660211

## Case

- **Full name:** Homer Charles WINKLES, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** April 7, 1982
- **Citations:** 634 S.W.2d 289; 1982 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 932
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing by Odom
- **Judges:** Roberts, Odom, Clinton, Teague
- **Cited by:** 43 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9660211

## Opinion text

OPINION ON STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING
ODOM, Judge.
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion on original submission, we hold that the affidavit was sufficient to support issuance of the search warrant. 1 Therefore, we grant the State’s motion for rehearing and affirm the judgment.
. Appellant suggests in a second ground of error that the evidence is insufficient when the fruits of the search are excluded from consideration. His premise having been overruled, the conclusion is likewise without merit.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9660211. Public record. Not legal advice.