# Wart v. Progressive Security Insurance Co.

> Louisiana Court of Appeal · April 8, 2009 · 7 So. 3d 865

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9658476

## Case

- **Full name:** Darwin Weymon WART, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PROGRESSIVE SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Et Al., Defendant-Appellant
- **Court:** Louisiana Court of Appeal
- **Decided:** April 8, 2009
- **Citations:** 7 So. 3d 865; 2009 WL 929508
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Brown
- **Judges:** Brown, Williams, Gaskins, Caraway, Drew
- **Cited by:** 4 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9658476

## Opinion text

BROWN, CHIEF JUDGE,
dissenting.
| Louisiana imposes UM coverage notwithstanding the language in the policy. Louisiana has a strong public policy favoring UM coverage. As stated by the trial court, Duncan v. U.S.A.A. Ins. Co., supra,, requires that a UM rejection form must be fully completed according to statutory re *872 quirements set forth in La. R.S. 22:680. In this case, the UM rejection form was not completed. See Gingles v. Dardenne, 08-2995 (La.03/13/09), 4 So.2d 799 .

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9658476. Public record. Not legal advice.