# DORBAD v. State

> District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 11, 2009 · 12 So. 3d 255

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9655585

## Case

- **Full name:** Leo DORBAD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
- **Court:** District Court of Appeal of Florida
- **Decided:** May 11, 2009
- **Citations:** 12 So. 3d 255; 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 4448; 2009 WL 1272334
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Benton
- **Judges:** Wolf, Browning, Benton
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9655585

## Opinion text

BENTON, J.,
concurring in the judgment.
I agree that the trial court erred in allowing the hearsay testimony the defense sought to exclude by its motion in limine, and that the conviction must be reversed for that reason. As the majority opinion explains, however, we are not holding that exclusion of Dr. Greer’s testimony required reversal.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9655585. Public record. Not legal advice.