# Aaron v. Havens

> Supreme Court of Missouri · October 18, 1988 · 758 S.W.2d 446

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9652799

## Case

- **Full name:** Lorri AARON, Appellant, v. David HAVENS, Respondent
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Missouri
- **Decided:** October 18, 1988
- **Citations:** 758 S.W.2d 446; 1988 Mo. LEXIS 88; 1988 WL 108134
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Welliver
- **Judges:** Billings, Blackmar, Donnelly, Higgins, Rendlen, Robertson, Welliver
- **Cited by:** 38 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9652799

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- stating "[i]t is not necessary to allege that past crimes involving entry into unauthorized places are of the same general nature as the one which gave rise to the claim.... If a burglar may enter, so may a rapist."

## Opinion text

WELLIVER, Judge,
concurring.
Were I free to do so, I would dissent in this case for all of the reasons set forth in my dissents in Virginia D. v. Madesco Inv. Corp. 648 S.W.2d 881 , (Mo. banc 1983), Madden v. C & K Barbecue Carryout, Inc., 758 S.W.2d 59 (Mo. banc 1988), and Decker v. Gramex Corp., 758 S.W.2d 59 (Mo. banc 1988). However, the binding precedent of the majority holdings of those cases compels me to concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9652799. Public record. Not legal advice.