# Marks v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · April 3, 2009 · 20 So. 3d 166

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9652102

## Case

- **Full name:** Garrett Jeremy MARKS v. STATE of Alabama
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
- **Decided:** April 3, 2009
- **Citations:** 20 So. 3d 166; 2008 WL 541889
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Shaw
- **Judges:** Baschab, McMillan, Wise, Welch, Shaw
- **Cited by:** 4 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9652102

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that “a motion for a judgment of acquittal that challenges the sufficiency of the evidence only generally, i.e., that the State failed to *754 prove a prima facie case or words to that effect, does not preserve for review the specific claim that an accomplice’s testimo…

## Opinion text

SHAW, Judge,
concurring specially.
I concur in the main opinion. I write specially only to urge the Alabama Supreme Court to clarify its holding in Ex parte Weeks, 591 So.2d 441 (Ala.1991), at its earliest convenience.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9652102. Public record. Not legal advice.