# Alston v. St. Paul Ins. Companies

> Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · December 8, 1989 · 389 Pa. Super. 396

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9650555

## Case

- **Full name:** Calvin ALSTON and Dorothy Alston, His Wife, Appellants, v. ST. PAUL INSURANCE COMPANIES, John T. Williams, M.D. and Vocational Rehabilitation Services, Inc. and Janet H. Rohrer
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** December 8, 1989
- **Citations:** 389 Pa. Super. 396; 567 A.2d 663; 1989 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3594
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Rowley
- **Judges:** Cirillo, President Judge, and Brosky, Rowley, McEwen
- **Cited by:** 13 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9650555

## Opinion text

ROWLEY, Judge,
dissenting.
I join the Dissenting Statement by Judge Johnson. I also join in the compelling analysis by Judge Brosky contained in the last two paragraphs of his Concurring and Dissenting Opinion. However, I do not agree with Judge Brosky’s conclusion that the findings by the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board are res judicata as to the claims asserted by appellants in the present case.
MELINSON, J., joins.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9650555. Public record. Not legal advice.