# Schochet v. State

> Court of Appeals of Maryland · October 9, 1990 · 320 Md. 714

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9649947

## Case

- **Full name:** Steven Adam SCHOCHET v. STATE of Maryland
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Maryland
- **Decided:** October 9, 1990
- **Citations:** 320 Md. 714; 580 A.2d 176; 1990 Md. LEXIS 161
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Chasanow
- **Judges:** Chasanow, Eldridge, Murphy
- **Cited by:** 36 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9649947

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- stating that “[gjeneral statutes ..., which, if given their broadest and most encompassing meaning, give rise to constitutional questions, have regularly been the subject of narrowing constructions so as to avoid the constitutional issues” and providing examples of such cases
- stating that "[g]eneral statutes ..., which, if given their broadest and most encompassing meaning, give rise to constitutional questions, have regularly been the subject of narrowing constructions so as to avoid the constitutional issues" and providing examples of such cases

## Opinion text

CHASANOW, Judge,
concurring:
I concur in the judgment in this case for the reasons stated by Judge Wilner in his dissenting opinion in Schochet v. State, 75 Md.App. 314 , 541 A.2d 183 (1988).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9649947. Public record. Not legal advice.