# Lambrecht v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · December 19, 1984 · 681 S.W.2d 614

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9648459

## Case

- **Full name:** Clarence Joseph LAMBRECHT, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** December 19, 1984
- **Citations:** 681 S.W.2d 614; 1984 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 819
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Miller
- **Judges:** Clinton, Teague, Miller, Onion, Campbell
- **Cited by:** 28 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9648459

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- noting the rules of appellate procedure “do not authorize review of claims which have not been presented in an orderly fashion and determined by the appropriate court of appeals”

## Opinion text

MILLER, Judge,
dissenting.
I am somewhat surprised the author of the majority opinion does not analyze the ease under the rationale of the majority opinion in Blankenship v. State, 673 S.W.2d 578 (Tex.Cr.App.1984).
For its failure to do so and for the reasons in Judge Teague’s opinion, I dissent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9648459. Public record. Not legal advice.