# Philadelphia Suburban Corp. v. Commonwealth

> Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · December 10, 1993 · 535 Pa. 298

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9648247

## Case

- **Full name:** PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN CORPORATION, Appellee, v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, BOARD OF FINANCE AND REVENUE, Appellant
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** December 10, 1993
- **Citations:** 535 Pa. 298; 635 A.2d 116; 1993 Pa. LEXIS 300
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Papadakos
- **Judges:** Cappy, Flaherty, Larsen, Montemuro, Nix, Papadakos, Zappala
- **Cited by:** 33 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9648247

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- recognizing the agency’s expertise and giving its interpretation “great weight”

## Opinion text

PAPADAKOS, Justice,
dissenting.
Since I believe this to be a case of double taxation as argued by the Appellee-taxpayer, I dissent and would affirm the order of the Commonwealth Court.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9648247. Public record. Not legal advice.