# HOGROBROOKS v. Board of Law Examiners

> Supreme Court of Arkansas · October 21, 2004 · 359 Ark. 247

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9643295

## Case

- **Full name:** Heather Patrice HOGROBROOKS v. BOARD of LAW EXAMINERS
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Arkansas
- **Decided:** October 21, 2004
- **Citations:** 359 Ark. 247; 195 S.W.3d 925; 2004 WL 2362032
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Glaze
- **Judges:** Glaze
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9643295

## Opinion text

Glaze, J., dissents. I would dismiss appeal, because counsel has already had an opportunity to comply with Rule 4 — 2(b) (3), and has failed to cure the deficiencies contained in her brief. Therefore, I would affirm for noncompliance with the court’s rules. See also Rule 4-1.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9643295. Public record. Not legal advice.
