# Srite v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.

> Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · January 6, 1994 · 870 S.W.2d 556

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9640608

## Case

- **Full name:** James F. SRITE and Erma M. Srite; James H. Bell and Mickey Bell; Estate of Otis Burt, Mable Burt, Ronald Burt, Kathy Hunter, and Gloria Polumbo, Appellants, v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., Fibreboard Corporation, and Pittsburgh-Corning Corporation, Appellees; Raymond JOCHIM and Mary Jochim; Clarence Ben and Ednora Ben; Erma Rae Friley, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Joseph Friley; James Morris and Helen Morris; Robert E. Bledsoe and Ellois Bledsoe; Clyde Spikes and Ruby Spikes, Appellants, v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., Fibreboard Corporation, Pittsburgh-Corning Corporation, and Keene Corporation, Appellees
- **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
- **Decided:** January 6, 1994
- **Citations:** 870 S.W.2d 556
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Wilson
- **Judges:** Huston-Dunn, Hedges, Duggan, Wilson, Cohen, Mirabal, Andell, Hutson-Dunn, Oliver-Parrott, O'Connor
- **Cited by:** 35 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- **Red flag:** Reversed on other grounds by Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Estate of Burt, 38 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 548 (1995).
- Negative treatments: 1
- Distinguished by: 0
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9640608

## Opinion text

WILSON, J.,
concurring without opinion.
The Court voted to determine if the cause should be heard en banc, Tex.R.App.P. 79(d), (e).
DUGGAN, COHEN, MIRABAL, WILSON, HEDGES, and ANDELL, JJ., voted against en bane consideration.
HUTSON-DUNN, J., voted for en banc consideration.
OLIVER-PARROTT, C.J., and O’CONNOR, J., recused themselves.
HUTSON-DUNN, J., dissenting from the Court’s refusal to consider the cause en banc.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9640608. Public record. Not legal advice.