# In Re Long

> Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · April 27, 1936 · 83 F.2d 458

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9637385

## Case

- **Full name:** In Re LONG
- **Court:** Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
- **Decided:** April 27, 1936
- **Citations:** 83 F.2d 458; 23 C.C.P.A. 1078; 1936 CCPA LEXIS 85
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Lenroot
- **Judges:** Hatfield, Lenroot, Graham, Bland, Garrett
- **Cited by:** 9 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9637385

## Opinion text

HATFIELD and LENROOT, Associate Judges
(dissenting).
The question of the right of the adverse parties in the interference proceeding to make appellant’s broad claims here involved should have been determined in that proceeding, in accordance with the. rules of the Patent Office, and former Patent Office and court decisions on the subject.
In our opinion, the decision of the Board of Appeals should be affirmed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9637385. Public record. Not legal advice.